Dear Robert Schwebel, > On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:58:22PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > The kernel should work for all users, not only for the majority, so: > > > Better safe than sorry. > > > > > > Also, defaults should make the system work. Tuning can be done later by > > > somebody who understands what is needed. > > > > > > And frankly, this attitude which made you add a potential regression is > > > worrisome. I'd suggest to give stability a higher priority. > > > > I believe you misunderstood my intention. Setting it to 400kHz was done > > because it's what most people will use, therefore avoiding duplication > > (most of the board files will override this setting now). All right, > > your sane defaults here can be applied, I won't argue. > > I think all I2C chips support 100 kHz, but only selected ones support > 400 kHz. Yes, this is correct. And I never argued about this. But anyway, V3 patch is out, let's cut this discussion short. Best regards, Marek Vasut -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
