On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 11:28:49AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > >Shouldn't this be (av8500->irq_base == NO_IRQ) now that we're tranisitioning to > >use 0 as NO_IRQ? > Sure, why not. I think the endgame is to phase out NO_IRQ entirely...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
