Re: [PATCH] i2c: Split I2C_M_NOSTART support out of I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 3 May 2012 10:58:15 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:52:11AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > Also, I'd think the FUNC_NOSTART bit should be 0x08 and SMBUS_PEC 0x4000. This
> > will be more intuitive, probably?
> 
> What is the value in renumbering everything?  It just seems like it
> makes the diff less clear and has no practical value.

You actually just can't renumber them, as they are part of the ABI to
user-space (through i2c-dev's ioctl I2C_FUNCS.)

-- 
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux