Dear Wolfram Sang, > > > What has the compiler version to do with the relevance? :) This has > > > nothing to do with adding DMA support. Plus, nobody so far could tell > > > me what path gcc is seeing there. > > > > It complains that data might be undefined, do you want it in a separate > > patch then ? > > Yes, but only if you can prove that the compiler is right. It's not right, because that variable is always initialized, but this at least squashes the compile warning. > > I still havent figured out how to flip between pioqueue mode and dma mode > > without the controller getting confused, so I prefer to postpone it into > > subsequent patch. Eventually, I agree it'd be cool to be able to do this > > switching. > > Yes, send V2 with DMA by default, and I will give a try on the > mode-switching later, too. I'd prefer to have PIOQ by default, to avoid breaking some of the boards. Or can you test on all of them? > > Thanks, > > Wolfram Best regards, Marek Vasut -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
