> > What has the compiler version to do with the relevance? :) This has > > nothing to do with adding DMA support. Plus, nobody so far could tell me > > what path gcc is seeing there. > > It complains that data might be undefined, do you want it in a separate patch > then ? Yes, but only if you can prove that the compiler is right. > I still havent figured out how to flip between pioqueue mode and dma mode > without the controller getting confused, so I prefer to postpone it into > subsequent patch. Eventually, I agree it'd be cool to be able to do this > switching. Yes, send V2 with DMA by default, and I will give a try on the mode-switching later, too. Thanks, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
