Re: [PATCHv8 06/10] I2C: OMAP: Fix the crash in i2c remove

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:44:15PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti wrote:
> On Monday 23 April 2012 10:19 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >>     [  154.901153] Exception stack(0xdf9b9fb0 to 0xdf9b9ff8)
> >> >     [  154.907104] 9fa0:                                     beaf1f04 4006be00 0000000f 0000000c
> >> >     [  154.915710] 9fc0: 4006c000 00000000 00008034 ffffff40 00000007 00000000 00000000 0007b8d7
> >> >     [  154.916778] 9fe0: 00000000 beaf1b68 0000d23c 4005baf0 80000010 ffffffff
> >> >     [  154.931335]  r6:ffffffff r5:80000010 r4:4005baf0 r3:beaf1f04
> >> >     [  154.937316] ---[ end trace 1b75b31a2719ed21 ]--
> >> > 
> >> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@xxxxxx>
> > Is this really the correct solution? I do wonder that every driver using
> > runtime PM should enable the clocks on their own. That should be done by
> > the core, 
> By core you don't mean the i2c core but the pm layer right?

Yes.

> > I'd say; it is not unusual that drivers need to write to
> > registers in remove(). If it is correct, can I get some acks?
> I did see the crash.

That was never a doubt. With "correct" I meant "correct solution".

> Will wait for the pm experts to comment.

Yup.

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux