On Monday 23 April 2012 10:19 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> [ 154.901153] Exception stack(0xdf9b9fb0 to 0xdf9b9ff8) >> > [ 154.907104] 9fa0: beaf1f04 4006be00 0000000f 0000000c >> > [ 154.915710] 9fc0: 4006c000 00000000 00008034 ffffff40 00000007 00000000 00000000 0007b8d7 >> > [ 154.916778] 9fe0: 00000000 beaf1b68 0000d23c 4005baf0 80000010 ffffffff >> > [ 154.931335] r6:ffffffff r5:80000010 r4:4005baf0 r3:beaf1f04 >> > [ 154.937316] ---[ end trace 1b75b31a2719ed21 ]-- >> > >> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@xxxxxx> > Is this really the correct solution? I do wonder that every driver using > runtime PM should enable the clocks on their own. That should be done by > the core, By core you don't mean the i2c core but the pm layer right? > I'd say; it is not unusual that drivers need to write to > registers in remove(). If it is correct, can I get some acks? I did see the crash. Will wait for the pm experts to comment. >> > --- >> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c | 2 ++ >> > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
