Re: [PATCHv8 06/10] I2C: OMAP: Fix the crash in i2c remove

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 23 April 2012 10:19 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>     [  154.901153] Exception stack(0xdf9b9fb0 to 0xdf9b9ff8)
>> >     [  154.907104] 9fa0:                                     beaf1f04 4006be00 0000000f 0000000c
>> >     [  154.915710] 9fc0: 4006c000 00000000 00008034 ffffff40 00000007 00000000 00000000 0007b8d7
>> >     [  154.916778] 9fe0: 00000000 beaf1b68 0000d23c 4005baf0 80000010 ffffffff
>> >     [  154.931335]  r6:ffffffff r5:80000010 r4:4005baf0 r3:beaf1f04
>> >     [  154.937316] ---[ end trace 1b75b31a2719ed21 ]--
>> > 
>> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@xxxxxx>
> Is this really the correct solution? I do wonder that every driver using
> runtime PM should enable the clocks on their own. That should be done by
> the core, 
By core you don't mean the i2c core but the pm layer right?
> I'd say; it is not unusual that drivers need to write to
> registers in remove(). If it is correct, can I get some acks?
I did see the crash.

Will wait for the pm experts to comment.

>> > ---
>> >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c |    2 ++

>> >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> > 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux