Re: i2c-tools: Discussion points about future library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> >   I would also search for the header filenames and invent such names
> > which will not clash with any existing. Same for "-li2c" or
> > whatever will apear on the ld line.
> 
> No, sorry. I'm not going to invent a fancy name to make sure it isn't
> clashing with something out there. If anyone wanted their code to
> become the standard Linux i2c library, they should have pushed it to
> major Linux distributions. Nobody did AFAICS.

+1

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux