On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 04:01:13PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > First point is the name of the library. My original intent was to name > it libi2c-dev, because the library is essentially a front-end to the > i2c-dev kernel driver, and also because this is what Debian named their > package currently containing the (i2c-tools flavor of) > <linux/i2c-dev.h>. However Aur??lien Jarno suggested that libi2c would > be just as fine, and easier/shorter. I am mostly convinced by now. I am > curious if anyone wants to express an opinion on the matter? FWIW the Debian convention is that the source package of a library is called libfoo building packages libfoo-dev with the headers and .so symlink to link against (or .a for a static library) and libfooN with the runtime in it (where N is the soname). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
