On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 15:46:00 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 03:38:20PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:57:51 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:58:30 +0100, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > > > > Indeed. If we were to rename it we should also rename struct > > > > gpio_i2cmux_platform_data. > > > > > > > > I don't feel strongly about it - It will break for existing users, but > > > > there's probably not too many of those. Your call. > > > > > > I see exactly 1 user of <linux/gpio-i2cmux.h> in the upstream kernel > > > tree, and that is gpio-i2cmux itself. So I'd say no big deal renaming > > > it, and actually if we intend to rename header files and/or structures, > > > the sooner the better. > > > > Wolfram, Peter, any progress here? I think Wolfram was supposed to send > > an updated patch but I did not receive anything. > > -EBUSY :( > > It *is* on my todo-list, though... Any news on this? -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
