Re: [PATCH] i2c: reorganize muxes to a standard pattern

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Wolfram" == Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

 >> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.i2c/7171/focus=7244
 >> 
 >> Ah, yes, that's the discussion I was looking for, thanks for digging it
 >> out. My point wasn't totally wrong back then, but Wolfram's is simply
 >> better, I admit.

 Wolfram> I agree :) Okay, so I'll update the documentation as well. What about
 Wolfram> include/linux/gpio-i2cmux.h and its users? I'd like consistency, but
 Wolfram> renaming header files is not too nice...

Indeed. If we were to rename it we should also rename struct
gpio_i2cmux_platform_data.

I don't feel strongly about it - It will break for existing users, but
there's probably not too many of those. Your call.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux