Re: [PATCH] i2c: reorganize muxes to a standard pattern

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 22:15:12 +0100, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> >>>>> "Jean" == Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>  >> rename drivers/i2c/muxes/{gpio-i2cmux.c => i2c-mux-gpio.c} (100%)
>  >> rename drivers/i2c/muxes/{pca9541.c => i2c-mux-pca9541.c} (100%)
>  >> rename drivers/i2c/muxes/{pca954x.c => i2c-mux-pca954x.c} (100%)
> 
>  Jean> You forgot to rename Documentation/i2c/muxes/gpio-i2cmux.
> 
>  Jean> I thought the naming had been discussed before, but I can't find the
>  Jean> references, and to be honest the new names please me, so I have no
>  Jean> reason to decline your proposal. I would have appreciated an ack from
>  Jean> the driver authors (Cc'd) though. I'll apply your patch as soon as I
>  Jean> receive an updated version, unless I get an objection before then.
> 
> Are you referring to this?
> 
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.i2c/7171/focus=7244

Ah, yes, that's the discussion I was looking for, thanks for digging it
out. My point wasn't totally wrong back then, but Wolfram's is simply
better, I admit.

> I originally called it i2c-gpiomux.c, and renamed it to gpio-i2cmux.c on
> request of you.
> 
> I don't mind the new name though, so:
> 
> Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter.korsgaard@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
-- 
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux