Hi Grant, Sorry for the late answer. On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:02:45 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Grant Likely > <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Currently, if an i2c bus driver supports both static and dynamic bus > > ids, it needs to choose between calling i2c_add_numbered_adapter() and > > i2c_add_adapter(). This patch makes i2c_add_numbered_adapter() > > redirect to i2c_add_adapter() if the requested bus id is -1. > > > > Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Oops, forgot to edit the email before sending the patch. > > This patch is as-yet untested other than build testing, but I want to > get feedback. With the move to DT on ARM, there are going to be a lot > more i2c bus drivers that need to support both static and dynamically > allocated busses, and it is very likely that it will be needed in the > v3.1 merge window. > > Ben/Jean, *IF* this patch tests out okay, and *IF* I get an ack from > you, it will probably need to have this commit in my devicetree/next > branch. If so, then I'll either need to commit it myself, or have it > put into a separate topic branch that both of us can merge into our > trees. What is your preference. > > John: this is the patch that I asked you to write earlier today, but I > think one of the TI folks will run into the same issue, so I wanted to > get it drafted and onto the list ASAP. If this makes your life easier then I have no objection, you can go ahead. I don't expect any conflict with my tree as there is no i2c-core work going on on my end at the moment. So you can just take it in your tree and merge it yourself as you see fit. Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
