On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:53 AM, Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Grant, > > Sorry for the late answer. > > On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:02:45 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Grant Likely >> <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Currently, if an i2c bus driver supports both static and dynamic bus >> > ids, it needs to choose between calling i2c_add_numbered_adapter() and >> > i2c_add_adapter(). This patch makes i2c_add_numbered_adapter() >> > redirect to i2c_add_adapter() if the requested bus id is -1. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Oops, forgot to edit the email before sending the patch. >> >> This patch is as-yet untested other than build testing, but I want to >> get feedback. With the move to DT on ARM, there are going to be a lot >> more i2c bus drivers that need to support both static and dynamically >> allocated busses, and it is very likely that it will be needed in the >> v3.1 merge window. >> >> Ben/Jean, *IF* this patch tests out okay, and *IF* I get an ack from >> you, it will probably need to have this commit in my devicetree/next >> branch. If so, then I'll either need to commit it myself, or have it >> put into a separate topic branch that both of us can merge into our >> trees. What is your preference. >> >> John: this is the patch that I asked you to write earlier today, but I >> think one of the TI folks will run into the same issue, so I wanted to >> get it drafted and onto the list ASAP. > > If this makes your life easier then I have no objection, you can go > ahead. I don't expect any conflict with my tree as there is no i2c-core > work going on on my end at the moment. So you can just take it in your > tree and merge it yourself as you see fit. > > Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks Jean, will do. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
