Jan, > I considered that change more complex and did not think it to be > worth the trouble for saving ~50 LOC (probably less with added > glue). Of course, it could be beneficial to have the algo part > shared if there are future updates to it. At the same time I suppose Or another core pops up using the same algorithm. > that it could be bad to have the algo part shared if the updates are > only valid for one of the cores. Well, for now it really seems it won't matter much. Plus, we could rip it out later if needed. OK, thanks for answering. Regards, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html