On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 11:38:15PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > From: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx> > > There isn't much point in managing our own custom timeout timer when the > completion interface already includes support for it. This makes the > resulting code much simpler and robust. This sounds like a good thing to do, but keep in mind that adapter->timeout values should be in jiffies (see 8a52c6b4d55b2960d93a90a7cf6afd252357fa54). Regards, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature