On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 04:52:21PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > The chips I'm deling with can certainly support doing that but I'm not > > > sure there'd be enormous advantages - a lot of the interrupt handlers > > > will either be trivial (eg, RTC ticks or alarms) or be serialised by a > > > need to interact with the chip anyway. I'd expect this to be generally > > > true, though ICBW. > > > So in your case it would be possible to run the various subdevice > > thread_fn handlers from your main interrupt thread one after each > > other ? > > That's what they're all doing at present outside of genirq. They just are racy against disable/enable/request/free I guess :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
