Hi Rodolfo, Sorry for the late answer, I missed this post in the middle of the thread. On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:48:13 +0100, Rodolfo Giometti wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:08:39PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Well, you can always do that if you want, but please first clearly > > define the practical problem you are trying to solve. We are not going > > to change the i2c core without a good reason. > > I created a new page here: > > http://i2c.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/I2C_bus_multiplexing Thanks for doing this! > Please, take a look and report everything should be fixed. :) Random comments: * I really would like to get rid of the "virtual" term that has been repeatedly abused. Bus segments behind multiplexers are very real. * I am surprised that you use the term "trunk" for all segments, be they in front of or behind multiplexers. When I think of a multiplexer, I designate the segment between the controller and the multiplexer as the trunk, and the segments behind the multiplexer as branches. Other than that I am rather happy with your page, which explains the problem and the proposed solution clearly. -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
