Hi Harald,
On Sun, 17 May 2009 14:04:39 +0800, Harald Welte wrote:
> The south bridge of the VIA VX855 chipset has a different PCI Device ID
> so i2c-viapro.c needs to be updated with this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Harald Welte <HaraldWelte@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-viapro.c | 3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-viapro.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-viapro.c
> index 02e6f72..7a0b15a 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-viapro.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-viapro.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
> VT8251 0x3287 yes
> CX700 0x8324 yes
> VX800/VX820 0x8353 yes
> + VX855/VX875 0x8409 yes
>
> Note: we assume there can only be one device, with one SMBus interface.
> */
> @@ -469,6 +470,8 @@ static struct pci_device_id vt596_ids[] = {
> .driver_data = SMBBA3 },
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_VX800),
> .driver_data = SMBBA3 },
> + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_VX855),
> + .driver_data = SMBBA3 },
> { 0, }
> };
>
Thanks for your contribution. You did not include
PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_VX855 to the list of devices which support I2C block
transactions (in function vt596_probe), is this on purpose or an
overlook?
--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
