On Mon, 11 May 2009, ÒÁÔó wrote:
> 2009/5/11 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:31:51AM +0100, Michael Abbott wrote:
> >
> >> static struct i2c_pxa_platform_data xcep_i2c_platform_data = {
> >> .class = I2C_CLASS_HWMON
> >> };
> >
> >> ...
> >> pxa_set_i2c_info(&xcep_i2c_platform_data);
> >
> >> This is called in the .init_machine method, and the target system is a
> >> PXA255.
> >
> >> However, after the error messages on startup, all the sensors seem to be
> >> detected and seem to be operating normally.
> >
> > These errors occur when attempting to talk to non-existant devices
> > which is almost certainly going to happen with the class based device
> > probing since the kernel will probe for each device at each possible
> > address on each I2C bus.
> that happen when the device driver registered but the hardware doesnot
> exist.i once met this when my camera driver could not find the hardware
> camera.
Fair enough. I have a bit of a challenge to specify the precise list of
I2C devices at the board level, as the board support is for a CPU module
with the I2C bus off-board ... and clearly I can live with the error
messages, anyway.
Still, I think it would make more sense for these to be one-liners; I
guess routine probing failures ought to be reported in a slightly
different way. I'll see if I can figure out a sensible patch.
