Hi Felipe, On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 05:55:50PM -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > Ben's right, there shouldn't be any need for this. This patch could cause > > some unnecessary interrupt service latency. > > That's not what Thomas Gleixner thinks. How about the possibility of > stack overflow ? That sounds like a separate issue from the spurious IRQ problem that the patch was intended to fix. I'm not familiar with the discussion on the stack overflow issue. Could you send a link? > According to Thomas (and Ingo, I'd say) all drivers should call > request_irq() with IRQF_DISABLED and that's gonna be true as soon as the > threaded irq handler support gets merged, if I'm not wrong. - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
