On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 05:55:50PM -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote: > Ben's right, there shouldn't be any need for this. This patch could cause > some unnecessary interrupt service latency. That's not what Thomas Gleixner thinks. How about the possibility of stack overflow ? According to Thomas (and Ingo, I'd say) all drivers should call request_irq() with IRQF_DISABLED and that's gonna be true as soon as the threaded irq handler support gets merged, if I'm not wrong. -- balbi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
