On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 18:54:31 +0000 Haiyang Zhang wrote: > We understand irqbalance may be a "bad idea", and recommended some > customers to disable it when having problems with it... But it's > still enabled by default, and we cannot let all distro vendors > and custom image makers to disable the irqbalance. So, our host- > networking team is eager to have per-CPU stats for analyzing CPU > usage related to irqbalance or other issues. You need a use case to get the stats upstream. "CPU usage related to irqbalance or other issues" is both too vague, and irqbalance is a user space problem.
