Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Refactor the ring-buffer iterator functions

[Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@xxxxxxxxx>]

> > @@ -470,7 +471,6 @@ struct vmpacket_descriptor *hv_pkt_iter_first_raw(struct
> > vmbus_channel *channel)
> > 
> >  	return (struct vmpacket_descriptor *)(hv_get_ring_buffer(rbi) + rbi-
> > >priv_read_index);
> >  }
> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hv_pkt_iter_first_raw);
> 
> Does hv_pkt_iter_first_raw() need to be retained at all as a
> separate function?  I think after these changes, the only caller
> is hv_pkt_iter_first(), in which case the code could just go
> inline in hv_pkt_iter_first().  Doing that combining would
> also allow the elimination of the duplicate call to 
> hv_pkt_iter_avail().

Good point.  Will do.

Thanks,
  Andrea