On 8/28/24 12:50, Frank Li wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 12:40:59PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 8/28/24 11:35, Frank Li wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 10:06:25AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 8/28/24 09:41, Frank Li wrote:
Convert binding doc ltc2978.txt to yaml format.
Additional change:
- add i2c node.
- basic it is regulator according to example, move it under regulator.
Fix below warning:
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a-clearfog-cx.dtb: /soc/i2c@2000000/i2c-mux@77/i2c@2/regulator@5c:
failed to match any schema with compatible: ['lltc,ltc3882']
Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>
---
Change from v3 to v4
- keep under hwmon directory.
Change from v2 to v3
- put my name into maintainers.
change from v1 to v2
- maintainer change to Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> (regulator maintainer)
- update title to (from ltc2978 data sheet).
octal, digital power-supply monitor, supervisor, sequencer, and margin controller.
---
.../bindings/hwmon/lltc,ltc2972.yaml | 94 +++++++++++++++++++
.../devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ltc2978.txt | 62 ------------
I still fail to understand the rationale for renaming the file from ltc2978
to ltc2972. I can see that 2972 is currently the alphabetically first supported
chip, but that is, in my opinion, irrelevant, and it will change.
Conor suggest use one of compatbile string as filename. I random pick one.
I am not care about filename. If you like, I can use lltc,ltc2978.yaml
or other filename.
The rename results in a disconnect between driver name and the associated
devicetree file. I fail to see the point of introducing that disconnect.
what's name do you prefered? lltc,ltc2978.yaml?
Yes.
Guenter
