Re: [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: (max16065) Fix alarm attributes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/21/24 22:47, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 08:48:51PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 7/21/24 20:30, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 12:35:06PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Chips reporting overcurrent alarms report it in the second alarm register.

I can't understand the sentence.  Not sure whether it needs to be rephrased or
not.  s/overcurrent/overvoltage/.


No, it is over-current. Not all chips support current measurements.
Those who do support it also support reporting over-current alarms.
Over-current alarms are reported in the second alarm register.

Table 16 in [1] and Table 11 in [2] use "overvoltage".  Please ignore the
comments if I'm misunderstanding.

[1]: https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/max16067.pdf
[2]: https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/max16068.pdf

Yes, those two chips don't support current or over-current reporting.
Only 160{65,66,70,71} support it.

Thanks,
Guenter





[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux