Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] gpio-cdev: Release IRQ used by gpio-cdev on gpio chip removal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 3:27 PM Herve Codina <herve.codina@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Bartosz,
>
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 08:21:09 +0100
> Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ...
> >
> > I DO want to fix it, don't get me wrong. I don't want to just leave it
> > like this, especially since we've made so much progress with
> > hotpluggability recently. I just don't believe this is the right fix,
> > I will try to come up with a solution that addresses the issue
> > globally.
> >
>
> I didn't see anything but I could miss something.
> Did you move forward on this topic ?
>

No, I'm currently spending almost 100% of my GPIO time on getting the
libgpiod DBus API ready and I should send the first version by the end
of this week. After that I'll be at EOSS and then on vacation, so the
earliest I will get to working on it is early May.

If you feel like giving it another shot - go for it. I believe the
device link problem I described previously[1] must be fixed first. I
would also consider a more generic solution in the interrupt subsystem
that would make it aware that interrupt controllers may be torn down
with interrupts still requested.

As I said: I will get to it but not in the following couple weeks.

Bart

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAMRc=Mf5fRWoOMsJ41vzvE=-vp3wi-Obw=j5fBk3DuQaZNQP2Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/





[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux