Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom,pmic-gpio: Allow gpio-hog nodes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Montag, 8. April 2024 19:26:49 CEST Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> 
> On 4/8/24 18:39, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > Allow specifying a GPIO hog, as already used on
> > qcom-msm8974-lge-nexus5-hammerhead.dts.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml          | 12 ++++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml
> > index a786357ed1af..510a05369dbb 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml
> > @@ -424,6 +424,10 @@ patternProperties:
> >               $ref: "#/$defs/qcom-pmic-gpio-state"
> >           additionalProperties: false
> >   
> > +  "^(hog-[0-9]+|.+-hog(-[0-9]+)?)$":
> 
> I see a couple bindings do this, but I'm not sure if we want two
> allow two styles for no reason.. Rob?

This regex is actually from the gpio-hog.yaml base
https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/blob/main/dtschema/schemas/gpio/gpio-hog.yaml#L23

Why it's made this way I cannot tell you, but I didn't want to 'artifically'
restrict the pattern for qcom,pmic-gpio.

> 
> Konrad
> 








[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux