On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 01:24:12PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 12:40:32PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > In some cases we already read the value from the register followed > > by a reading of it again for other purposes, but the both reads > > are under the lock and bits we are insterested in are not going > > to change (they are not volatile from HW perspective). Hence, no > > need to read the same registeer twice. > > Typo "registeer" -> "register" Will fix when applying. ... > Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thank you! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko