On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 12:40:32PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > In some cases we already read the value from the register followed > by a reading of it again for other purposes, but the both reads > are under the lock and bits we are insterested in are not going > to change (they are not volatile from HW perspective). Hence, no > need to read the same registeer twice. Typo "registeer" -> "register" > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>