RE: [v3][libgpiod][PATCH 1/1] gpio-tools-test.bats: modify delays in toggle test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I finally (I hope) got rid of the "sleep" comment.

I have not used bats before, but I gather that the bats file will get parsed 160 times since you have 159 tests.  Breaking the file up into pieces might help, but that's only a guess.  For me, the bats tests take about 4 minutes in qemu.

Joe

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, June 5, 2023 8:43 PM
> To: Slater, Joseph <joe.slater@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; MacLeod, Randy
> <Randy.MacLeod@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [v3][libgpiod][PATCH 1/1] gpio-tools-test.bats: modify delays in
> toggle test
> 
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 01:43:35PM -0700, joe.slater@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Joe Slater <joe.slater@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The test "gpioset: toggle (continuous)" uses fixed delays to test
> > toggling values.  This is not reliable, so we switch to looking for
> > transitions from one value to another.
> >
> > We wait for a transition up to 1.5 seconds.
> >
> 
> For future reference, the subject line should've been "[libgpiod][PATCH v3]".
> The version goes within the [PATCH], and 1/1 is optional unless you have a cover
> letter.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Slater <joe.slater@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> 
> Here you would normally list the changes between revisions.
> So I'm not sure what has actually changed since v1.
> The loop limit went from 10 to 15?
> 
> >  tools/gpio-tools-test.bats | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/gpio-tools-test.bats b/tools/gpio-tools-test.bats
> > index c83ca7d..05d7138 100755
> > --- a/tools/gpio-tools-test.bats
> > +++ b/tools/gpio-tools-test.bats
> > @@ -141,6 +141,20 @@ gpiosim_check_value() {
> >  	[ "$VAL" = "$EXPECTED" ]
> >  }
> >
> > +gpiosim_wait_value() {
> > +	local OFFSET=$2
> > +	local EXPECTED=$3
> > +	local DEVNAME=${GPIOSIM_DEV_NAME[$1]}
> > +	local CHIPNAME=${GPIOSIM_CHIP_NAME[$1]}
> > +	local
> PORT=$GPIOSIM_SYSFS/$DEVNAME/$CHIPNAME/sim_gpio$OFFSET/value
> > +
> > +	for i in {1..15}; do
> > +		[ "$(<$PORT)" = "$EXPECTED" ] && return
> > +		sleep 0.1
> > +	done
> > +	return 1
> > +}
> > +
> >  gpiosim_cleanup() {
> >  	for CHIP in ${!GPIOSIM_CHIP_NAME[@]}
> >  	do
> > @@ -1567,15 +1581,15 @@ request_release_line() {
> >  	gpiosim_check_value sim0 4 0
> >  	gpiosim_check_value sim0 7 0
> >
> > -	sleep 1
> > -
> > -	gpiosim_check_value sim0 1 0
> > +	# sleeping fixed amounts can be unreliable, so we
> > +	# sync to the toggles
> > +	#
> 
> You said you would get rid of this comment.
> 
> 
> The patch works for me, so I'm otherwise fine with it.
> 
> Cheers,
> Kent.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux