On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 5:11 PM Slater, Joseph <joe.slater@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I finally (I hope) got rid of the "sleep" comment. > > I have not used bats before, but I gather that the bats file will get parsed 160 times since you have 159 tests. Breaking the file up into pieces might help, but that's only a guess. For me, the bats tests take about 4 minutes in qemu. > > Joe > FYI, I've opened an issue[1] on bats-core github as strace output for -c -f switches was right after all. Bart [1] https://github.com/bats-core/bats-core/issues/733 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Monday, June 5, 2023 8:43 PM > > To: Slater, Joseph <joe.slater@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; MacLeod, Randy > > <Randy.MacLeod@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: [v3][libgpiod][PATCH 1/1] gpio-tools-test.bats: modify delays in > > toggle test > > > > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 01:43:35PM -0700, joe.slater@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > From: Joe Slater <joe.slater@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > The test "gpioset: toggle (continuous)" uses fixed delays to test > > > toggling values. This is not reliable, so we switch to looking for > > > transitions from one value to another. > > > > > > We wait for a transition up to 1.5 seconds. > > > > > > > For future reference, the subject line should've been "[libgpiod][PATCH v3]". > > The version goes within the [PATCH], and 1/1 is optional unless you have a cover > > letter. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Joe Slater <joe.slater@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > > Here you would normally list the changes between revisions. > > So I'm not sure what has actually changed since v1. > > The loop limit went from 10 to 15? > > > > > tools/gpio-tools-test.bats | 24 +++++++++++++++++++----- > > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/tools/gpio-tools-test.bats b/tools/gpio-tools-test.bats > > > index c83ca7d..05d7138 100755 > > > --- a/tools/gpio-tools-test.bats > > > +++ b/tools/gpio-tools-test.bats > > > @@ -141,6 +141,20 @@ gpiosim_check_value() { > > > [ "$VAL" = "$EXPECTED" ] > > > } > > > > > > +gpiosim_wait_value() { > > > + local OFFSET=$2 > > > + local EXPECTED=$3 > > > + local DEVNAME=${GPIOSIM_DEV_NAME[$1]} > > > + local CHIPNAME=${GPIOSIM_CHIP_NAME[$1]} > > > + local > > PORT=$GPIOSIM_SYSFS/$DEVNAME/$CHIPNAME/sim_gpio$OFFSET/value > > > + > > > + for i in {1..15}; do > > > + [ "$(<$PORT)" = "$EXPECTED" ] && return > > > + sleep 0.1 > > > + done > > > + return 1 > > > +} > > > + > > > gpiosim_cleanup() { > > > for CHIP in ${!GPIOSIM_CHIP_NAME[@]} > > > do > > > @@ -1567,15 +1581,15 @@ request_release_line() { > > > gpiosim_check_value sim0 4 0 > > > gpiosim_check_value sim0 7 0 > > > > > > - sleep 1 > > > - > > > - gpiosim_check_value sim0 1 0 > > > + # sleeping fixed amounts can be unreliable, so we > > > + # sync to the toggles > > > + # > > > > You said you would get rid of this comment. > > > > > > The patch works for me, so I'm otherwise fine with it. > > > > Cheers, > > Kent.