On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 04:16:27PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 4:10 PM Russell King (Oracle) > <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 01:32:29PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > ... > > > Let me say again: I am not changing this. That's for Asahi people to > > do if they wish. I am the just middle-man here. > > While I agree on technical aspects, this mythical "they" is > frustrating me. They haven't participated in this discussion (yet?) so > they do not care, why should we (as a community of upstream)? > > P.S. Do you have a platform to test all these? Right, having addressed as many review comments as I possibly can, I've rebuilt and booted it on the platform - and the good news is, it still works _but_ I don't have enough support in the "mainline" kernel that I'm testing for anything to make use of any of the interrupt support in this patch set - so I can't actually test those changes. I'm going to drop the interrupt patch temporarily as it's unnecessary for what I want to do, which will be one less patch to worry about. I still need a resolution between you and Hector over the smc_key issue - specifically, do I pick up the patch that adds support for %p4ch, or do we re-architect the smc_key thing and also in doing so get rid of the need for your "endian conversion" thing. Given that Hector has rejected some of your comments, I now need to back out those changes that resulted from your NIH comments. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!