> On 5. 9. 2022, at 17:32, Russell King (Oracle) <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I still need a resolution between you and Hector over the smc_key > issue - specifically, do I pick up the patch that adds support for > %p4ch, or do we re-architect the smc_key thing and also in doing so > get rid of the need for your "endian conversion" thing. Idea about the %p4ch thing: We will leave the keys true to their nature (i.e. 32-bit integer), and at least initially for the prints we will employ macros #define SMC_KEYFMT “%c%c%c%c” #define SMC_KEYFMT_VAL(val) (val)>>24,(val)>>16,(val)>>8,(val) used like printk(“blah blah” SMC_KEYFMT “ blah\n”, SMC_KEYFMT_VAL(key)); This has the nice property that it is pretty much like the specifier, and later can be easily replaced with the real thing. -- Martin