On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 12:11:44PM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 03:45:11PM -0700, Gabriel Knezek wrote: > > Probably should've been [PATCH v2], despite the subject rename. > > And CC the maintainers (LinusW and Bart here) and past reviewers (Andy > and me). > Sorry about that. When sending the revised patch, should I change it to v2? Or perhaps v3? > > From: Gabriel Knezek <gabeknez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > A second From: header? With a different address? > Perhaps you could pick one? > Neither git nor checkpatch.pl seem to mind, but it is odd. > Apologies for that as well. git send-email doesn't play well with Exchange, so after talking to coworkers it turns out we have a separate email server for sending patches which I wasn't aware of before I sent the first one. :-/ Sorry for the confusion; I'll stick to the @linux address. > > > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Knezek <gabeknez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > You should retain the Fixes tag from v1 - it is important to identify > where this patch will need to be backported to. > And include at least the first twelve characters of the SHA-1 [1]. > Oh shoot. Sorry about that as well. I need to make a checklist. Thanks for the link; I did read it before submitting the second patch, but I clearly missed that part. > > Still good with this bit ;) > > Cheers, > Kent. Thanks for the kind help. I promise I'll update our wiki with these learnings so hopefully dealing with the next person from our team submitting a patch won't be so painful. -Gabe