Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] pinctrl: intel: Convert capability list to features

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 2:46 PM Mika Westerberg
<mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 02:31:23PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 2:22 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 9:09 AM Mika Westerberg
> > > <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

...

> > > I don't see how it could be achieved (offsets can be unordered). If
> > > there is such an issue it will mean a silicon bug.
> >
> > Specification says clearly that one register is a must and its value
> > defines the behaviour.
> >
> > "The first Capability List register is located at offset 0x004...  and
> > contains a pointer/address to the next Capability List register. The
> > first Capability List register is no different than others... except
> > for its “Capability Identification” field is always 0. The total
> > number of Capability List registers... is 1 at the minimum (to
> > determine if there is any capability)."
>
> This is not the first time something like this is done wrong at silicon
> level.

I agree. What about solving the issue when it comes?

> IMHO it is always good idea to avoid possible infinite loops
> especially in the kernel space.

But do PCI / xHCI (the first two that came to my mind) have something like this?

> > So I prefer to stick with my original variant.
>
> OK.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux