Re: [PATCH/RFC] pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7791: Fix VIN1 versioned groups

[Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 3:11 PM Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 01:45:17PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > The naming of the "b" versions of the VIN1 pin groups is a bit odd, in
> > that the "_b" appears in the middle of the names, instead of as a
> > suffix.
> >
> > Increase consistency with other SoCs by making R-Car M2-W and M2-N, and
> > RZ/G1M and RZ/G1N, use the recently added optional "version" argument of
> > the VIN_DATA_PIN_GROUP() macro.
> >
> > Note that this breaks backwards compatibility with existing DTBs, but
> > there are no upstream users of the "vin1_b_*" names.
> >
> > Fixes: 8e32c9671f84acd8 ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7791: Add VIN pins")
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Is it worth making this change?
> > If yes, should we retain backwards-compatibility using e.g. the patch
> > below, increasing kernel size by 380 bytes?
> >
> > Note that unlike the deprecated "avb_mdc" pin groups on R-Car Gen3, the
> > "vin1_b_*" groups never had upstream users, so I'm inclined not to care
> > about backwards compatibility.
>
> That sounds fine to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, queuing in sh-pfc-for-v5.1.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds