On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 01:45:17PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > The naming of the "b" versions of the VIN1 pin groups is a bit odd, in > that the "_b" appears in the middle of the names, instead of as a > suffix. > > Increase consistency with other SoCs by making R-Car M2-W and M2-N, and > RZ/G1M and RZ/G1N, use the recently added optional "version" argument of > the VIN_DATA_PIN_GROUP() macro. > > Note that this breaks backwards compatibility with existing DTBs, but > there are no upstream users of the "vin1_b_*" names. > > Fixes: 8e32c9671f84acd8 ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7791: Add VIN pins") > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Is it worth making this change? > If yes, should we retain backwards-compatibility using e.g. the patch > below, increasing kernel size by 380 bytes? > > Note that unlike the deprecated "avb_mdc" pin groups on R-Car Gen3, the > "vin1_b_*" groups never had upstream users, so I'm inclined not to care > about backwards compatibility. That sounds fine to me. Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>