Hi Linus, On 22/02/18 15:30, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 8:23 PM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Am Montag, 19. Februar 2018, 19:03:27 CET schrieb Florian Fainelli: > >>>> Can you indicate which DTS file is used for your Chromebook model? Sorry about the breakage. >>> >>> that should be >>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru-kevin.dts >>> >>> I'm vacationing right now, so don't think I'll find time to dive into >>> Rockchip pinctrl this week. But I'd guess it could be somehow >>> related to the ATF touching pins during suspend/resume? >> >> That'd be really unfortunate. I would have assumed that ATF would >> leave things as they were instead of re-configuring them to whatever >> default. >> >> The most annoying thing is that if that's indeed the case, we need to >> find a solution that will cope with the current state of the >> firmware. I guess that'd mean eagerly saving/restoring the pin state >> across suspend/resume, irrespective of what firmware could do? > > What is ATF? Asus Touch Firmware? More like "ARM Trusted Firmware", aka the firmware that runs on the secure side of most 64bit ARM systems. > Does it in effect mean that when the Rockchip pinctrl driver > says pinctrl_force_sleep() and pinctrl_force_default() > it expects those to be a noop? > > Then the real patch to apply is something deleting the > pinctrl_force* calls from the pinctrl-rockchip driver, > is it not? Quite possibly. Unravelling this bit of code, I came to a similar conclusion. The question is then: what is this call supposed to be used for? I'm pretty sure it is not completely gratuitous, but it makes no sense on my platform. I'll give it a go later today. M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html