Re: [PATCH] gpio: Timestamp events in hardirq handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Felipe Balbi
> <felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Alexander Stein
>>> <alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, November 30, 2017, 10:26:55 AM CET Linus Walleij wrote:
>>>
>>>>> +     s64 timestamp;
>>>>     ^^^
>>>> u64? ktime_get_real_ns() returns u64 and struct gpioevent_data
>>>> has __u64 for timestamp.
>>>
>>> OK sorry, fixing it. Thanks for noticing!
>>
>> This is not on next. Will it miss this merge window?
>
> I realized yesterday when doing a security fix that it was missing.
>
> Because I didn't get the merge conflict I expected :D
>
> So I merged it. Don't worry. Sorry for the fuzz!

No problem, I'll refetch linux-next tomorrow or the day after and start
testing it.

Thanks

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux