Re: [RFC] libgpiod public API reviews needed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 02:28:40PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to release libgpiod v1.0 soon (preferably before FOSDEM
> 2018). The first version (v0.x series) was written in a matter of two
> weeks and the API was not well designed. Since v0.3 release I've been
> working on redesigning the public API to make it simplier and more
> useful.
> 
> I want to commit to a stable interface for the library starting from
> v1.0 but it would be great if I could get some reviews first - it's
> basically only about reviewing a single public header: include/gpiod.h
> in which all public symbols are documented. Any implementation details
> can always be changed later.
> 
> The most prominent changes since 0.3 include:
> - removal of custom error handling in favor of errnos
> - merge of two separate interfaces for event requests and regular line requests
> - redesign of the simple API
> - addition of a bunch of helpers for line requests
> - redesign of the iterator API
> - making the use of prefixes more consistent
> - renaming of symbols all over the place
> - and various minor tweaks
> 
> As far as usefulness goes - the user space tools that are included all
> use this API and it looks pretty clean.
> 
> The project is hosted at kernel.org:
> 
>     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/libgpiod/libgpiod.git/
> 
> and the code that needs review is on the master branch.
> 
> Thanks in advance to anyone who'll find the time to take a look.
> 

Thanks for your work, I am using your library and I am trying to promote it.

Some people were confused concerning the naming when requesting line(s)
as output. 'init_val(s)' may be better than 'default_val(s)'.

The callback for gpiod_simple_set_value(_multiple) is optional, you may mention
it. Concerning the multiple variant, I would enforce that the callback
is called when ALL the values are set.
I don't see the added value of this callback. What's the difference with
executing it depending on gpiod_simple_set_value(_multiple) return value?

Regards

Ludovic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux