On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thursday, November 30, 2017, 10:26:55 AM CET Linus Walleij wrote: >> + s64 timestamp; > ^^^ > u64? ktime_get_real_ns() returns u64 and struct gpioevent_data > has __u64 for timestamp. OK sorry, fixing it. Thanks for noticing! Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] gpio: Timestamp events in hardirq handler
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Timestamp events in hardirq handler
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 10:49:28 +0100
- In-reply-to: <3058528.dbeyJzq7DI@ws-stein>
- References: <20171130092655.25965-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <3058528.dbeyJzq7DI@ws-stein>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] gpio: Timestamp events in hardirq handler
- From: Felipe Balbi
- Re: [PATCH] gpio: Timestamp events in hardirq handler
- References:
- [PATCH] gpio: Timestamp events in hardirq handler
- From: Linus Walleij
- Re: [PATCH] gpio: Timestamp events in hardirq handler
- From: Alexander Stein
- [PATCH] gpio: Timestamp events in hardirq handler
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Timestamp events in hardirq handler
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 6/6] gpiolib: acpi: Introduce NO_RESTRICTION quirk
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Timestamp events in hardirq handler
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Timestamp events in hardirq handler
- Index(es):
 |