On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ping! I am mostly happy with the series but: - I would like Grygorii to get time to review it or at least ACK and say his points are adressed. - Thierry said quite early that he has to make a v6 respin since it collides with other patches. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v5 00/13] gpio: Tight IRQ chip integration
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/13] gpio: Tight IRQ chip integration
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 14:44:27 +0100
- In-reply-to: <42211eed-3996-b968-330c-36c6ca160e0b@nvidia.com>
- References: <20171013154913.29448-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com> <f25cd66f-1382-8007-9744-0dbd72757163@nvidia.com> <a71b5600-dc22-c53a-7909-48e39c8cf3e6@nvidia.com> <42211eed-3996-b968-330c-36c6ca160e0b@nvidia.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v5 00/13] gpio: Tight IRQ chip integration
- From: Thierry Reding
- Re: [PATCH v5 00/13] gpio: Tight IRQ chip integration
- From: Jon Hunter
- Re: [PATCH v5 00/13] gpio: Tight IRQ chip integration
- From: Jon Hunter
- Re: [PATCH v5 00/13] gpio: Tight IRQ chip integration
- From: Jon Hunter
- [PATCH v5 00/13] gpio: Tight IRQ chip integration
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: sirf: Use common error handling code in sirfsoc_dt_node_to_map()
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/4] pinctrl: Add skew-delay pin config and bindings
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v5 00/13] gpio: Tight IRQ chip integration
- Next by thread: [PATCH] gpio: mark expected switch fall-throughs
- Index(es):
 |