Re: [PATCH v5 00/13] gpio: Tight IRQ chip integration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ping!

On 23/10/17 09:47, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Linus,
> 
> On 16/10/17 19:09, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Hi Linus,
>>
>> On 13/10/17 16:49, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Hi Linus,
>>>
>>> here's the latest series of patches that implement the tighter IRQ chip
>>> integration. I've dropped the banked infrastructure for now as per the
>>> discussion with Grygorii.
>>>
>>> The first couple of patches are mostly preparatory work in order to
>>> consolidate all IRQ chip related fields in a new structure and create
>>> the base functionality for adding IRQ chips.
>>>
>>> After that, I've added the Tegra186 GPIO support patch that makes use of
>>> the new tight integration.
>>
>> I have reviewed this series and tested on Tegra, so for the series ...
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> We would really like to get support for Tegra186 GPIO in v4.15, so
>> please let us know if you think that this is do-able.
> 
> Any feedback/comments?
> 
> Thanks
> Jon
> 

-- 
nvpublic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux