On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:46:24PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 11:02:21AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > Shouldn't there be a free if the remove function? I'm not even sure > > where the remove function is so I don't know. > > As the pinctrl driver is essential for the platform, it's always a > builtin_platform_driver which we do not even have a remove function. > Ah. Good deal, then. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: zte: fix 'functions' allocation in zx_pinctrl_build_state()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: zte: fix 'functions' allocation in zx_pinctrl_build_state()
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 12:55:59 +0300
- In-reply-to: <20170717094622.GE3172@dragon>
- References: <1500212008-29321-1-git-send-email-shawnguo@kernel.org> <20170717080221.gqf7xgeo2zqgigdq@mwanda> <20170717094622.GE3172@dragon>
- User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: zte: fix 'functions' allocation in zx_pinctrl_build_state()
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_crc: Uniquify device name
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: zte: fix 'functions' allocation in zx_pinctrl_build_state()
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: zte: fix 'functions' allocation in zx_pinctrl_build_state()
- Index(es):
 |