On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 11:02:21AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Shouldn't there be a free if the remove function? I'm not even sure > where the remove function is so I don't know. As the pinctrl driver is essential for the platform, it's always a builtin_platform_driver which we do not even have a remove function. Shawn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: zte: fix 'functions' allocation in zx_pinctrl_build_state()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: zte: fix 'functions' allocation in zx_pinctrl_build_state()
- From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 17:46:24 +0800
- Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 30E1A22B57
- In-reply-to: <20170717080221.gqf7xgeo2zqgigdq@mwanda>
- References: <1500212008-29321-1-git-send-email-shawnguo@kernel.org> <20170717080221.gqf7xgeo2zqgigdq@mwanda>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: zte: fix 'functions' allocation in zx_pinctrl_build_state()
- From: Dan Carpenter
- Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: zte: fix 'functions' allocation in zx_pinctrl_build_state()
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] pinctrl: sh-pfc: propagate errors on group config
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: zte: fix 'functions' allocation in zx_pinctrl_build_state()
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: zte: fix 'functions' allocation in zx_pinctrl_build_state()
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: zte: fix 'functions' allocation in zx_pinctrl_build_state()
- Index(es):
 |