Re: [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: do not fall back to parsing _CRS when we get a deferral

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2017-03-28 at 15:25 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > If, while locating GPIOs by name, we get probe deferral, we should
> > immediately report it to caller rather than trying to fall back to
> > parsing
> > unnamed GPIOs from _CRS block.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Can I get some indication from Mika/Rafael/Andy whether this is
> correct?

While Mika agrees on the change, I would like nevertheless to hear Hans'
opinion or even Tested-by tag since it was his fix around those lines.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html