Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 03/28/2017 11:30 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> '> When trying to add a gpio-hog, we enter a weird loop where the gpio-ranges >>> is needed when gpiochip_add_data() is called but in the current implementation >>> the ranges are added from the driver afterwards. >>> >>> A simple solution is to rely on the DR gpio-ranges attribute and remove the >>> call to gpiochip_add_pin_range(). >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> This is fine once the ranges have been applied to the device trees I guess. >> >> Tell me when you want me to merge this. >> >> Yours, >> Linus Walleij >> > > Hi Linus, > > Kevin should merge the DT patches since they have now Tested and Reviewed by's, so you can merge it now if you can. > Since it will live in you pinctrl tree, it will only impact linux-next until Kevin merges them. I've applied the DT patches now (branch: v4.12/dt64) Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html