On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If, while locating GPIOs by name, we get probe deferral, we should > immediately report it to caller rather than trying to fall back to parsing > unnamed GPIOs from _CRS block. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> Can I get some indication from Mika/Rafael/Andy whether this is correct? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: do not fall back to parsing _CRS when we get a deferral
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: do not fall back to parsing _CRS when we get a deferral
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 15:25:56 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20170323202138.GA11912@dtor-ws>
- References: <20170323202138.GA11912@dtor-ws>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: do not fall back to parsing _CRS when we get a deferral
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: do not fall back to parsing _CRS when we get a deferral
- From: Mika Westerberg
- Re: [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: do not fall back to parsing _CRS when we get a deferral
- References:
- [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: do not fall back to parsing _CRS when we get a deferral
- From: Dmitry Torokhov
- [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: do not fall back to parsing _CRS when we get a deferral
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 0/8] gpio: acpi: Make it working
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/8] pinctrl: meson: gxl: add i2s output pins
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: do not fall back to parsing _CRS when we get a deferral
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: do not fall back to parsing _CRS when we get a deferral
- Index(es):
 |