Hi,
On 15-03-17 11:54, Mika Westerberg wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:31:36AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
When acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get gets called with an index of say 2, it should
not care if acpi_get_gpiod for index 0 or 1 returns -EPROBE_DEFER.
This allows drivers which request a gpioint with index > 0 to function
if there is no gpiochip driver (loaded) for gpioints with a lower index.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I am dependent on Mika and Rafael to review ACPI/GPIO patches,
maybe I should just put in a special entry to MAINTAINERS for
this file... anyway let's see what they say.
Hans, could you in future Cc patches related to ACPI to linux-acpi
mailing list as well?
Ok, will do.
This one I looked up from linux-gpio mail
archives.
The patch looks good to me so,
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thank you.
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
